Why does fanny criticize lenina

He is also horrified to see that a class watching scenes of devout Christians beating themselves while asking for Jesus's forgiveness can do nothing but laugh at the scenes before them. Meanwhile, in the darkness of the classroom, Bernard is flirting with Miss Keate. John asks the kids if they read Shakespeare. The answer is no, because if they're only looking for entertainment, they'd rather go to the feelies. They don't condone "solitary amusements. There, they received toys and ice cream, so as to be conditioned into the attitude that death is nothing to get upset about.

While John holds back his disgust, Bernard makes a date for that evening with the Headmistress. On the way back home, Bernard and John stop at the Television Corporation factory. While Bernard runs inside, John watches the lower caste men on their way home from work, each with a little cardboard box. Bernard returns; John, thinking of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice , asks him about the contents of those little "caskets.

Bernard explains that the boxes all have two grams of soma — their daily ration. Meanwhile, back at the Changing Room, Lenina dresses excitedly, revealing to Fanny that Bernard is busy so she gets to take "the Savage" to the feelies for the night.

Fanny thinks to herself that Lenina is lucky to share so much of Bernard's spotlight in regards to the Savage. More to the point, all the big important men have been having sex with her. But, Lenina says, most of these men just want to hear about what it's like to have sex with the Savage. Basically, no one believes her when she says she never slept with him. That transitions the girls nicely into the conversation of whether or not John likes Lenina.

He avoids her, she says, but he also seems to stare at her a lot, which is confusing. Of course, those of us who experienced pigtail-pulling on the playground don't find this confusing at all, but if you've been brought up playing erotic games of "hunt the zipper," subtlety isn't exactly your forte.

John's feelings aside, one thing is certain: Lenina has the hots for him. And she thinks tonight's as good a chance as any for them to finally hook up. At the feelies that night, she and John relax to the smells and sounds of the scent organ just… read your book. We can't explain this one to you. There's a big deal made out of the fact that the musical notes can range as low as the lowest note ever sung and as high as, well, the highest note ever sung by humans, anyway.

Fanny expresses surprise that Lenina is still dating Henry exclusively after four months. She advises Lenina to be more promiscuous, as a virtuous member of World State should. Fanny warns that Bernard has a bad reputation for spending time alone and is smaller and less confident than other Alphas.

Fanny mentions the rumors that someone might have accidentally injected alcohol into his blood surrogate when he was in the bottle. As the Director and Mustapha Mond explain to the boys how the World State works in an abstract way, the interspliced scenes of Lenina and Bernard show the society in action. Bernard is the sole character to protest—almost silently—the way the system works.

His discomfort with the commodification of sex marks him as a misfit. It comes from a sense that he might never fully belong to that society.

In addition to prenatal and postnatal conditioning, the World State controls the behavior of its members through the forces of social conformity and social criticism. Both peers and superiors, like Fanny and the Director, are constantly watching to ensure that each citizen is behaving appropriately. In his long speech about the history of the World State, Mustapha Mond blames the previously sacred institutions of family, love, motherhood, and marriage for causing social instability in the old society.

Individuals cannot always be relied upon to choose the path of most stability since family, love, and marriage produce divided allegiances. Freely acting individuals must constantly weigh the moral value and the moral consequences of their actions. Mond argues that the divided allegiances of individuals produce social instability.

For this reason, the World State has eliminated all traces of non-State institutions. The citizen is socialized to only have an allegiance to the State; personal connections of all sorts are discouraged, and even the desire to develop such connections is conditioned away.

The constant availability of physical satisfaction evident in the feelies, the abundance of soma, the easy attainment of sex through state-sanctioned promiscuity, and the lack of any historical knowledge that might point to an alternate way of life, ensure that the way of life developed and instituted by the World State will not be threatened. Mustapha Mond and the Director spend a good deal of time discussing the importance of consumption.

I want sin. Does God want goodness or the choice of goodness? Is a man who chooses the bad perhaps in some way better than a man who has the good imposed upon him? Religion can be considered as a system of belief followed by a significant number of people, and this can be applied to a number of different situations in Brave New World. An aspect of this treatment of religion in this novel that I find particularly interesting is the selection of figureheads.

In the World State, the figurehead of the religion is Henry Ford. This obvious replacement indicates to me that Huxley is alluding to the arbitrary nature by which people select the figureheads of their religions. I think that this is a commentary on the ability of mankind to construct a religion from any person, and the centre of any religion is perfectly random. An intriguing way that Huxley used religion in his novel Brave New World as a social commentary was drawing parallels between the Christian church and the religion of drugs and sex in the World State.

One example of this parallel is the ritualistic drinking of the soma in a group setting, which seems to be a direct reference to the taking of the Eucharist. The inversion of these characteristics, especially the glorification of drug use and promiscuity and the condemnation of monogamy, allowed me to think about the deeper workings of religion.

I think that Huxley was attempting to open the mind of the reader up to the idea of the fickle nature of religion, about how what is considered holy and sacrosanct in one generation could be what is highly condemned the next, and vice versa.

This is also demonstrated in the seemingly random nature of the selection of the figureheads of religion. Get Quality Help Your matched tutor provides personalized help according to your question details. No Results Found. Brave New World. Aldous Huxley. Chapter 1. Physics report. Engineering project.

Please Answer the question. Structural Engineering 2. Critical Thinking Case studies. Management Question. New a script for a video presentation with reference. Fundamental of databases. Chapter 3. Chapter Upload them to earn free Studypool credits! Les Miserables by Victor Hugo. The Catcher in the Rye by J. Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Woolf.

Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. The Road by Cormac McCarthy. What Happened by Hillary Clinton. Girl Stop Apologizing by Rachel Hollis. Little Fires Everywhere by Celeste Ng. The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath. Herzog by Saul Bellow. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Beowulf by Anonymous Anglo-Saxon poet. The Silent Patient by Alex Michaelides. The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir. Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse. Studypool Inc. Studypool is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.

Enter the email address associated with your account, and we will email you a link to reset your password. An email has been sent to. Take 10 seconds to Sign up! Access over 20 million homework documents through the notebank. Read s of rich book guides covering popular titles.